This page lists selected public archival records for Synkyria.

Zenodo records are treated as frozen, citable reference points. The living website provides orientation and navigation; the DOI records provide stable archival anchors.

Current public release

Finite-Capacity AI Constitution

A structural governance framework for accountable AI systems operating under finite capacity.

The canonical document package contains the structured document set for the Finite-Capacity AI Constitution, including the constitutional article draft, force and applicability note, AI assistant application profile, minimal reviewable evidence specification, questions/limits/misreadings note, and policy translation brief.

The external-safe reference implementation demonstrates how minimum reviewable artefacts may be generated without requiring disclosure of private runtime internals.

The Companion Expansion v1.1 supports the canonical package with four practical instruments: a Reader’s Guide, a Failure and Disclosure Protocol, an Authority / Human Review Protocol, and an Implementation / Evidence Template Pack. It makes the constitutional core more readable, inspectable, and usable without revising it.

Refusal and finite-capacity foundations

The Synkyria Refusal Stack v1.0

Kalomoirakis, P. (2026). The Synkyria Refusal Stack v1.0 (Archival Proof Object): Law → Bounds → Operator → Evidence. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.18518359

This deposit is an archival proof object: a unified stack showing that refusal — explicit rejection or gating — is a viability primitive in finite-capacity information-processing systems. It also shows that the refusal necessity line and operator semantics can be reviewed externally without disclosing internal thresholds or proprietary parameters.

Within Synkyria, this is the foundational external-safe refusal stack: later runtime or pilot claims about refusal are intended either to reduce to this stack or to declare a versioned extension with explicit deltas.

The Thermodynamic Right to Refusal

Kalomoirakis, P. (2026). The Thermodynamic Right to Refusal: A Synkyrian Theory of Holding, Information Load, and Sustainable Processing. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.18557678

This work gives a thermodynamic and queue-theoretic statement of why refusal — explicit rejection or gating — is structurally necessary in finite-capacity information-processing systems.

Under sustained overload, any policy enforcing zero long-run rejection forces effective load to diverge and holding capacity to collapse. The central takeaway is that selective rejection is not optional: it is necessary for viability under bounded capacity.

Role in the Refusal Stack: Law / Necessity layer.

Foundational Synkyria text

Fractal Onto-Praxis

Kalomoirakis, P. (2026). Fractal Onto-Praxis: Viability, Non-Closure, and the Conditions of Form. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.18301722

Fractal Onto-Praxis is a foundational Synkyria text specifying an architectural and conceptual grammar for thinking viability under finitude without reducing it to optimisation, technique, or moral narrative.

It develops a field-first orientation: viability is treated as a prior condition of form and decision, rather than an outcome of improved performance. It articulates non-closure as a structural condition: under finite horizons, continuation must remain admissible without consuming the possibility of further admissible continuation.

Structural Phenomenology of Viability

SFV-00 methodological entry note

Kalomoirakis, P. (2026). SFV-00: What Structural Phenomenology of Viability Is — A Methodological Entry Note for the SFV Series. Site-hosted PDF.

This note serves as the entry membrane for the SFV series: it clarifies what SFV is, how to read it, and how not to misuse it as clinical method, diagnostic taxonomy, protocol, or technique.

SFV Synthesis and Corpus Binder

Kalomoirakis, P. (2026). Structural Phenomenology of Viability: A Synthesis — Contactability, Therapeutic Time, and Non-Coercive Emergence under Finite Capacity. Site-hosted PDF.

This synthesis functions as Bridge G for the SFV+RSN corpus. It names the three structural axes of SFV — Field of Contactability, Operational / Therapeutic Time, and Non-Coercive Emergence of Form — and clarifies the AEW–SFV relation: accountable action under finite capacity translates, at the lived level, into contactability, holdable time, and non-coercive emergence.

Kalomoirakis, P. (2026). Synkyria — Translational Corpus Binder: SFV + RSN, v0.2. Site-hosted PDF.

SFV temporal anchor

Kalomoirakis, P. (2026). Therapeutic Time in Structural Phenomenology of Viability. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.19663502

This note serves as SFV-10 / temporal anchor: therapeutic time is treated as field-thickened and historically carried time, not mere chronological duration.

How to cite

Use the DOI corresponding to the object being referenced:

  • cite the Finite-Capacity AI Constitution canonical document package for the current governance/document package;
  • cite the external-safe reference implementation for the implementation surface or artefact-generation demonstration;
  • cite The Synkyria Refusal Stack for the refusal-stack proof object;
  • cite The Thermodynamic Right to Refusal for the law/necessity layer of refusal under overload;
  • cite Fractal Onto-Praxis for the foundational viability and non-closure architecture;
  • cite Therapeutic Time in Structural Phenomenology of Viability for the SFV temporal anchor;
  • cite the SFV Synthesis and SFV+RSN Binder v0.2 as living site-hosted corpus-orientation artefacts unless and until DOI records are issued.

Contact

For institutional, research, or review inquiries:

research@synkyria.uk