Synkyrian Stability as an Architectural Framework
ID: P0
Type: Paper
Status: Zenodo (frozen)
What it establishes (in one paragraph)
P0 defines the canonical viability language of Synkyria: finite-horizon survival under load and hazard. It formalises holding as a horizon-indexed surrogate of failure probability and uses this to translate “stability” into an architectural constraint: what can remain admissible before collapse.
Key outputs
- A horizon-first notion of viability (fail-before-T vs. asymptotic claims).
- A canonical holding / hazard framing that other papers treat as the spine variable.
- A design stance: viability constraints come before optimisation.
Downstream dependencies
- P1 (filtering micro-law), P2 (geometric synthesis), P3–P4 (refusal), P5–P6 (networks/policy).
↩︎ Back to the Library.